GOGGIN
v PAULINE GOGGIN
Thank
you for the letter and the letters from Drever and Heddle.
There
are of course matters which arise from the content.
DEALINGS
WITH MRS GOWLAND
Mrs
Gowland contacted Pauline in July 94 about the safety of a
goat
she sold to Mr and Mrs Burr at Deerness. The goat was dry
and
not milking but was to have potential as a good milker. Mrs
Gowland
accused the Burrs of miss treating the goat and she was
concerned
to find it a good home. I was reluctant to take on
other
persons problems as we had 173 goats on the property and
I
considered we were over stocked. I had known the goat known as
Dilly
before , She was awkward to milk, had poor udder
conformation
and was strong and mindless. I had a selection of
poor
quality goats and was in no mood to accept other peoples.
I
spent a considerable amount of money to up grade the herd and
ensure
its medical status was good. A new goat would compromise
all
I had achieved to date therefore it would have to be tested
and
cleared before it was brought into the herd. I would not
consider
anything less. Pauline and Marilyn Gowland were close
friends,
but I held out for the testing, and agreed to pay the
vets
fees.
The
goat arrived in a good condition, was strong and had no signs
of
miss treatment, The goat was in better condition than
Marilyn's
stock. I wormed and treated the animal for,coccidia ,
and
gave it a full course of Hyptovac, and cobalt as a precaution.
On
30 September I saw Mrs Gowland on watch in the Ops room in the
presence
of 2 regular Coastguard Officers and told her that I had
received
a vets bill, and the testing fee was not included. The
vet
Mr Mcharg, in the presence of his wife informed me, that the
Gowland's
had been billed for the treatment. I was aware that the
Gowland's
financial position was precarious and she could ill
afford
a large bill. I told her to let me know how much it cost,
and
to submit an invoice, to go through the books
I
have never received an invoice, I have never been told a
price,
but thought it could be in the region of £30, the price I
last
paid for individual testing.
I
am incensed that I have been accused of withholding payment of such a
small amount.
I
would expect an apology at the very least. I think the relationship
between Pauline and Marilyn Gowland needs to be clarified.
In
1992 Dennis and Marilyn Gowland, short of cash, asked to be
employed
as Auxiliary Coastguards at Kirkwall.
Marilyn
completed training Dennis did not. Marilyn commenced work
as
an Ops room Assistant in the summer of that year. Pauline
considered
Marilyn to be her closest friend, and they met
regularly.
In
1993 Pauline was upset that Marilyn was aware of events at the
Station she knew nothing about, or I never told her of. Idle ops
room gossip seldom filters up to Management level.
In
the later part of 93 early 94 a Senior watch Officer complained that
Marilyn was flirting with the staff and was concerned that some
members were vulnerable.
In
1994 Pauline told me in confidence that Marilyn had gone too far with
a watch
officer
and was on the verge of an affair. I was not told with whom the
affair was with but it was with someone who's marriage was in
difficulty, I had a short list of 2 vulnerable watches.
I
ensured she kept to a minimum, watches with these 2 watches, and
she
spent more time with the other watches, which we not so easily
flattered or flirted with. I told none of the staff or other
management what I was doing, but did receive a nasty unsigned letter
of complaint about her conduct in less than flattering terms.
I
suspect it was at the instigation of a regular officers wife. As the
letter was not signed I treated it with contempt and disposed of it.
On reflection I should have kept it.
Pauline
knows and some suspect the imminent breakdown of Mrs
Gowland's
marriage, family and social life. I suspect Mrs Gowland
will
support Pauline in her endeavours through fear it may all come out. I
see no other reason for her behaviour.
Finally
as you have seen in the case of the straw, wheelbarrow
etc.
I pay the bills in good faith first then seek redress later
yours
faithfully
No comments:
Post a Comment